<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article article-type="normal" xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PALEVO</journal-id>
         <issn>1631-0683</issn>
         <publisher>
            <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>
         </publisher>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="pii">S1631-0683(15)00047-0</article-id>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crpv.2015.03.004</article-id>
         <article-categories>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="type">
               <subject>Research article</subject>
            </subj-group>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
               <subject>General Palaeontology, Systematics and Evolution</subject>
            </subj-group>
         </article-categories>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>Bone histology and growth in <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (Archosauromorpha: Rhynchosauria) from the Middle Triassic of the Ruhuhu Basin of Tanzania</article-title>
            <trans-title-group xml:lang="fr">
               <trans-title>Histologie osseuse et mode de croissance chez <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (Archosauromorpha : Rhynchosauria) du Trias moyen du bassin Ruhuhu de Tanzanie</trans-title>
            </trans-title-group>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group content-type="editors">
            <contrib contrib-type="editor">
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>Michel</given-names>
               </name>
               <email/>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="editor">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>Jorge</given-names>
               </name>
               <email/>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <contrib-group content-type="authors">
            <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
               <name>
                  <surname>Werning</surname>
                  <given-names>Sarah</given-names>
               </name>
               <email>sarah.werning@stonybrook.edu</email>
               <xref rid="aff0005" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>a</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name>
                  <surname>Nesbitt</surname>
                  <given-names>Sterling J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <xref rid="aff0010" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>b</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff0005">
               <aff>
                  <label>a</label> Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA</aff>
               <aff>
                  <label>a</label>
                  <institution>Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University</institution>
                  <city>Stony Brook</city>
                  <postal-code>NY 11794</postal-code>
                  <country>USA</country>
               </aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff0010">
               <aff>
                  <label>b</label> Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA</aff>
               <aff>
                  <label>b</label>
                  <institution>Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic and State University</institution>
                  <city>Blacksburg</city>
                  <postal-code>VA 24061</postal-code>
                  <country>USA</country>
               </aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
         </contrib-group>
         <pub-date-not-available/>
         <volume>15</volume>
         <issue seq="15">1-2</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="pii">S1631-0683(16)X0002-4</issue-id>
         <issue-title>Current advances in paleohistology: A tribute to a generation of Frenchpaleohistologists</issue-title>
         <fpage seq="0" content-type="normal">163</fpage>
         <lpage content-type="normal">175</lpage>
         <history>
            <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2014-12-01"/>
            <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2015-03-11"/>
         </history>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>© 2015 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
            <copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
            <copyright-holder>Académie des sciences</copyright-holder>
         </permissions>
         <self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="application/pdf" xlink:href="main.pdf">
                        Full (PDF)
                    </self-uri>
         <abstract abstract-type="author">
            <p id="spar0005">The bone histology of non-archosauriform archosauromorphs is understudied but is important for tracing the evolution of growth in archosaurs and their closest relatives. Here, we describe the femoral and tibial histology of a single individual of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic>, a Middle Triassic rhynchosaur from Tanzania. Both elements are composed largely of moderately vascularized parallel-fibered bone tissue, which becomes avascular and more lamellar approaching the periosteum. The spacing between growth marks in <italic>S. stockleyi</italic> strongly attenuates with age, suggesting determinate growth for this taxon. Whereas the bone tissue suggests slower growth compared to South American rhynchosaurs, which have fibrolamellar bone tissue and exhibit more anastomoses between canals, the determinate growth pattern seems to be shared among hyperodapedontid rhynchosaurs. Although non-archosauriform archosauromorphs vary in the rate of bone deposition and growth in their first year, all taxa examined to date grew relatively slowly compared to most archosauriforms.</p>
         </abstract>
         <trans-abstract abstract-type="author" xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0010">L’histologie osseuse d’archosauromorphes non archosauriformes est mal connue par rapport à celle des archosauriformes, en particulier à celle des archosauriens Orthodira (ancêtres des oiseaux). Nous décrivons ici l’histologie du fémur et du tibia d’un unique individu de <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic>, un rhynchosaurien du Trias moyen de Tanzanie. Ces deux éléments sont en grande partie constitués de tissu osseux en fibres parallèles, modérément vascularisé, qui devient non vascularisé et plus lamellaire à l’approche du périoste. L’espacement entre les marques de croissance chez <italic>S. stockleyi</italic> s’atténue fortement avec l’âge, ce qui suggère une croissance déterminée dans ce taxon. Alors que le tissu osseux suggère une croissance plus lente par rapport à celle observée chez les rhynchosauriens d’Amérique du Sud, qui ont tissu osseux fibro-lamellaire et présentent un plus grand nombre d’anastomoses entre les canaux, le schéma de croissance déterminée semble être partagé parmi les rhynchosauriens hypérodapédontidés. Bien que le taux de dépôt d’os et de croissance soit variable chez les archosauromorphes non archosauriformes au cours de leur première année, tous les taxons examinés jusqu’à présent ont une croissance relativement lente, comparée à celle de la plupart des archosauriformes.</p>
         </trans-abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <unstructured-kwd-group>Archosauria, Paleohistology, Histological variation, Growth rates, Gondwana</unstructured-kwd-group>
         </kwd-group>
         <kwd-group xml:lang="fr">
            <unstructured-kwd-group>Archosauria, Paléohistologie, Variation histologique, Taux de croissance, Gondwana</unstructured-kwd-group>
         </kwd-group>
         <custom-meta-group>
            <custom-meta>
               <meta-name>presented</meta-name>
               <meta-value>Handled by Michel Laurin</meta-value>
            </custom-meta>
         </custom-meta-group>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body>
      <sec id="sec0005">
         <label>1</label>
         <title id="sect0025">Introduction</title>
         <p id="par0005">The bone microstructure of archosaurs and their extinct relatives has been a ripe area of study for paleohistologists in general (e.g., <xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</xref>, <xref rid="bib0130" ref-type="bibr">Enlow, 1969</xref>, <xref rid="bib0135" ref-type="bibr">Enlow and Brown, 1957</xref>, <xref rid="bib0165" ref-type="bibr">Gross, 1934</xref>, <xref rid="bib0190" ref-type="bibr">Horner et al., 2001</xref>, <xref rid="bib0300" ref-type="bibr">Peabody, 1961</xref> and <xref rid="bib0320" ref-type="bibr">Seitz, 1907</xref>) and French paleohistologists in particular (e.g., <xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Cubo et al., 2012</xref>, <xref rid="bib0385" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil et al., 2015</xref>, <xref rid="bib0105" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès, 1976</xref>, <xref rid="bib0110" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al., 2003</xref> and <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al., 2008</xref>). Much recent work in this field has focused on the origin and evolution of avian growth rates and thermophysiology. As a result, the long bone histology of bird-line (ornithodiran) archosaurs (e.g., <xref rid="bib0070" ref-type="bibr">Chinsamy et al., 1995</xref>, <xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Cubo et al., 2012</xref>, <xref rid="bib0160" ref-type="bibr">Griffin and Nesbitt, In revision</xref>, <xref rid="bib0270" ref-type="bibr">Nesbitt et al., 2013</xref> and <xref rid="bib0360" ref-type="bibr">Werning et al., 2011</xref>) is much better characterized in both number of taxa and phylogenetic breadth compared to that of crocodile-line (pseudosuchian) archosaurs. Outside the crown, several studies have suggested that many of the histological features associated with elevated growth and metabolic rates were already present among the Archosauriformes (= stem archosaurs; e.g., <xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</xref>, <xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Cubo et al., 2012</xref>, <xref rid="bib0235" ref-type="bibr">Legendre et al., 2013</xref>, <xref rid="bib0315" ref-type="bibr">Scheyer et al., 2014</xref>, <xref rid="bib0350" ref-type="bibr">Werning, 2013</xref> and <xref rid="bib0360" ref-type="bibr">Werning et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
         <p id="par0010">Few studies have examined the long bone histology of non-archosauriform archosauromorphs, but this region of the saurian phylogenetic tree (<xref rid="fig0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>A) is important for establishing the plesiomorphic conditions of tissue structure, growth rate, metabolism, and thermophysiology for Archosauromorpha (after the split with lepidosauromorphs, including squamates and rhynchocephalians). In those early diverging archosauromorph taxa that have been characterized, the bone tissue structure generally suggests slower growth compared to archosauriforms, with most taxa exhibiting moderately to poorly vascularized parallel-fibered or lamellar bone (<xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</xref>, <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al., 2008</xref>, <xref rid="bib0145" ref-type="bibr">Ezcurra et al., 2014</xref>, <xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al., in press</xref> and <xref rid="bib0355" ref-type="bibr">Werning and Irmis, 2011</xref>). However, with two exceptions (<xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref> and <xref rid="bib0355" ref-type="bibr">Werning and Irmis, 2011</xref>), no taxon has been sampled in large enough numbers to address ontogenetic variation in growth or histology. Greater sampling among non-archosauriform archosauromorphs is necessary to understand the distribution of and variation in growth-related histological features.</p>
         <p id="par0015">An ideal clade on which to focus sampling efforts is Rhynchosauria, a group of non-archosauriform archosauromorphs restricted to the Triassic. Rhynchosaurs represent one of the earliest groups of archosauromorphs to reach a nearly Pangean distribution (<xref rid="bib0005" ref-type="bibr">Benton, 1983</xref>, <xref rid="bib0010" ref-type="bibr">Benton, 1984</xref>, <xref rid="bib0120" ref-type="bibr">Dilkes, 1995</xref> and <xref rid="bib0125" ref-type="bibr">Dilkes, 1998</xref>). Not only were rhynchosaurs widely distributed and rather common in the southern portion of Pangea, but they were the first large reptiles (up to 2 m in length) to appear in the Triassic fossil record with craniofacial adaptations for herbivory (<xref rid="bib0120" ref-type="bibr">Dilkes, 1995</xref>). Well supported phylogenies of rhynchosaur interrelationships (<xref rid="bib0120" ref-type="bibr">Dilkes, 1995</xref>, <xref rid="bib0125" ref-type="bibr">Dilkes, 1998</xref>, <xref rid="bib0245" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2010</xref> and <xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2013</xref>) found that most craniodental features indicative of herbivory clearly originated before increases in body size; yet, the process of this change has not been documented in detail. Furthermore, both Late Triassic (<xref rid="bib0060" ref-type="bibr">Chatterjee, 1974</xref> and <xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al., in press</xref>) and Middle Triassic (unpublished specimens of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>) taxa are known from at least a partial growth series.</p>
         <p id="par0020">Despite this potential, the bone histology of rhynchosaurs is not thoroughly described. <xref rid="bib0135" ref-type="bibr">Enlow and Brown (1957)</xref> and Enlow (1969) first described the rib microstructure of <italic>Hyperodapedon sanjuanensis</italic> (then <italic>Scaphonyx sanjuanensis</italic>). Armand <xref rid="bib0105" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès (1976)</xref> also commented on the rib histology of <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> (then <italic>Scaphonyx</italic>), but the sections were not illustrated or described in detail until a later work (<xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al., 2008</xref>). More recently, a <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> limb bone was illustrated by <xref rid="bib0310" ref-type="bibr">Sanchez et al. (2012)</xref>, but was not described histologically. To date, the only studies to focus on rhynchosaur osteohistology are that of <xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al. (in press)</xref>, who sectioned long bones and ribs of a <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> species and <italic>Teyumbaita sulcognathus</italic>, both from Brazil, and <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee (2015)</xref>, who sectioned long bones from the Indian rhynchosaurs <italic>H. huxleyi</italic> and <italic>H. tikiensis</italic>, including a femoral growth series. Although the Late Triassic hyperodapedontine rhynchosaurs are now well sampled, little is known about growth in earlier diverging rhynchosaurs, or whether these forms are representative of the entire clade.</p>
         <p id="par0025">Here, we present new histological data on the Middle Triassic rhynchosaur <italic>S. stockleyi</italic>, based on the midshafts of a femur and tibia from a single individual. Each bone appears to preserve nearly the entire ontogenetic growth record. <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> is an excellent candidate for histological study because it is known from associated crania and postcrania of various size classes. Additionally, <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> is one of the earliest large-bodied rhynchosaurs (&gt; 1 m in length), a size on par with that of Late Triassic rhynchosaurs.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0010">
         <label>2</label>
         <title id="sect0030">Materials and methods</title>
         <sec id="sec0015">
            <label>2.1</label>
            <title id="sect0035">Institutional abbreviations</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0030">MCZ (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA); NHMUK (Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom); NMT (National Museum of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania); SAM (Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa); UFRGS (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil).</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0020">
            <label>2.2</label>
            <title id="sect0040">Specimen and locality information</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0035">We sampled the mid-diaphyses of a left femur and right tibia (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>A, C) from a single individual of <italic>S</italic>. <italic>stockleyi</italic>, NHMUK PV R 36618 (field number U2/26). This specimen was collected in 1963 by the British Museum (Natural History) – University of London Joint Paleontological Expedition from the Middle Triassic (?Late Anisian) Manda beds in the Ruhuhu Basin, Songea District, Tanzania (Triassic locality 2; see <xref rid="bib0080" ref-type="bibr">Cox, 1991</xref>, Text – Fig. 1 for map). According to collection notes made by Alan Charig (NHMUK unpublished fieldnotes), the femur and tibia were collected together with “various pieces of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>, including excellent vertebrae, not necessarily associated”. However, the specimen includes contralateral elements of identical size (tibiae, humeri, calcanea) and preserves no duplicate elements, suggesting a single individual (SW, pers. obs.).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0040">The morphology and proportions of the limb elements are consistent with that of <italic>S. stockleyi</italic> (<italic>sensu</italic>
                  <xref rid="bib0340" ref-type="bibr">von Huene, 1938</xref>), but femoral and tibial autapomorphies for this species are not yet known. Among the preserved elements is a right maxilla, which can be assigned to <italic>S. stockleyi</italic> based on the presence of the following character states: lingual teeth present, teeth bulbous, and three rows of anteroposteriorly aligned teeth separated by deep grooves (SJN, pers. obs.). Like the assignment of NHMUK PV R 36618 to <italic>S. stockleyi</italic>, the limb elements by themselves cannot be unambiguously assigned to Rhynchosauria because most of the informative character states supporting the monophyly of and interrelationships among rhynchosaurs derive from the skull. However, they are consistent with the hindlimb morphology of larger rhynchosaurs (e.g., <italic>T. sulcognathus</italic>, <xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2013</xref>): they are robust and have a large internal trochanter and similar epiphyseal expansions.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0045">
                  <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> is in need of a complete revision because the holotype (SAM 10651, Stockley number S340) represents a mixed assemblage (rhynchosaur postcrania with archosaur maxillae; <xref rid="bib0185" ref-type="bibr">Haughton, 1932</xref>) and there is a great deal of undescribed material. However, it appears that there is only one large rhynchosaur from the Lifua Member of the Manda beds, as all of the cranial material, including the maxillary tooth plates, are similar in morphology. Therefore, we use <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> in the sense of <xref rid="bib0340" ref-type="bibr">von Huene's (1938)</xref> description of referred material of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>, based on associated skeletons (some articulated) and skulls with maxillae.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0025">
            <label>2.3</label>
            <title id="sect0045">Histological preparation</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0050">SW prepared histological slides using the methods <xref rid="bib0225" ref-type="bibr">Lamm (2013)</xref> described for fossil bone. Prior to sectioning, we photographed, molded, and cast both elements to preserve the original morphology; these are reposited at NHMUK. Images of these elements pre-sectioning are available on MorphoBank (list of images in SOM; <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://morphobank.org/permalink/?P1245">http://morphobank.org/permalink/?P1245</ext-link>; <xref rid="bib0285" ref-type="bibr">O’Leary and Kaufman, 2012</xref>), Project P1245. We removed the mid-diaphyses and embedded them in Silmar-41 clear polyester resin (US Composites, West Palm Beach, FL, USA) catalyzed with methyl ethyl ketone peroxide at 1% by mass. The resin cured at room temperature for at least 72 hours before sectioning on an IsoMet 1000 precision saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA). Sections were serially cut at 1.5–2 mm intervals and mounted to glass slides using clear Devcon<sup>®</sup> 2 Ton<sup>®</sup> Epoxy (ITW Polymers Adhesives, Danvers, MA, USA). Slides were ground using progressively finer silicon carbide grit papers on a P30F-1-HA grinder-polisher (Precision Surfaces International, Houston, TX, USA). Preparation records are on file at NHMUK.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0030">
            <label>2.4</label>
            <title id="sect0050">Histological imaging</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0055">Slides were imaged dry and wet with water to increase light penetration. To create digital cross-sections, we took overlapping images of each slide with a QIClick F-CLR-12 digital camera (QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada) mounted to a DMRXE transmitted light microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), using either a single polarizing filter or under circularly polarized light. Photomosaics were assembled using Surveyor version 7.0.0.7 (Objective Imaging Inc., Kansasville, WI, USA). We adjusted the images (leveling, adding scale bars) and traced the growth marks and periosteum in Photoshop CS6 Extended (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). High-resolution images of these sections are available on MorphoBank.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0035">
            <label>2.5</label>
            <title id="sect0055">Measurements</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0060">External measurements of the sampled femur and tibia were obtained using an 8-inch digital caliper (Neiko Tools, China) and a tailor's soft measuring tape (Amico, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada). We took histological measurements from digital cross-sections T2 and Fe3 using Photoshop CS6 Extended. Mid-diaphyseal and medullary cavity diameter were measured along their respective major and minor axes using Ruler Tool. Zonal widths were measured along the cross-sectional major axis (widest width of section) and minor axis (shortest height of section perpendicular to major axis). Sectional axes are visible in MorphoBank images M346027 and M346740. Generally this produced four measurements, which were averaged. Because the externalmost growth marks are only partially preserved, the zonal widths between them were measured as close to a major or minor axis as possible, along a radius extending from the intersection of the major and minor axes. All measurements are reported in <xref rid="tbl0005" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0065">For each element, we estimated daily bone deposition rates for the three main phases of growth (recorded year 1, years 2–5, years 6–12). The tissue between adjacent annual lines of arrested growth or annuli represents all the bone deposited in that year. For extant species, daily [radial] bone deposition rates are estimated by dividing the width of this zone by the number of days in the known growth season (e.g., <xref rid="bib0030" ref-type="bibr">Castanet, 1985</xref>). In extinct taxa, the duration of the growth season is unknown and requires estimation. One approach is to estimate minimum bounds for daily growth under the assumption that the growth season lasted an entire year, but this method underestimates actual daily rates by a considerable amount if the growth season occurred in a small window of time (<xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</xref> and <xref rid="bib0035" ref-type="bibr">Castanet and Baez, 1991</xref>). Therefore, we estimated daily bone deposition under four hypothetical growth durations: 383 days (the estimated length of a Middle Triassic year; <xref rid="bib0345" ref-type="bibr">Wells, 1963</xref>), 365 days, 270 days, and 180 days (corresponding to a modern year, nine month, and six month growth season, respectively). For the first year of growth, we calculated two sets of rates, assuming a neonatal [geometric] radius of 2.5 mm or 5 mm for each element. Calculations are reported in the <xref rid="sec0105" ref-type="sec">Supplemental Online Material (SOM)</xref>.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0040">
         <label>3</label>
         <title id="sect0060">Results</title>
         <sec id="sec0045">
            <label>3.1</label>
            <title id="sect0065">Histological descriptions</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0070">We use the osteohistological terminology of <xref rid="bib0155" ref-type="bibr">Francillon-Vieillot et al. (1990)</xref>, the bone orientation terminology of <xref rid="bib0170" ref-type="bibr">Gower (2003)</xref>, and the phylogenetic relationships of <xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Nesbitt et al. (in revision)</xref> and <xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al. (2013)</xref>. We describe general features of the cross-section first, then discuss aspects of the microstructure in detail, moving from the endosteal margin to the periosteal surface. Numbers in parentheses beginning with “M” (e.g., M339571) denote specific images on MorphoBank.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="sec0050">
               <label>3.1.1</label>
               <title id="sect0070">Femur</title>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0075">The mid-diaphyseal section of the femur is subcircular in cross-section, with the adductor ridge (= internal trochanter, the hypothesized attachment location of the caudofemoralis musculature) visible as a small triangular projection between the ventral and posterior faces (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>B, ar). The endosteal margin is difficult to discern in this slide because of taphonomic trabecular fracturing, but in other slides and cut blocks, a distinct subrectangular medullary cavity lies slightly off center (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>B, mc; M339571, M346024). Cancellous bone comprises almost two thirds of the bone's diameter, but does not reach the growth marks except in the anterodorsal quadrant, where they extend past the third line of arrested growth (LAG). The compact cortical bone is fairly even in thickness around the section, but is slightly thinner dorsally.</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0080">The endosteal lamellae (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>B, el) form a band 2–3 times thicker than the trabeculae of the innermost cortex. The trabeculae clearly formed through the resorption of primary compact bone, which is still visible between erosion rooms especially in the posterior quadrant (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>D). Endosteally, erosion rooms are irregular or oval and closely spaced, and become rounder and farther spaced periosteally. They are largest in the posteroventral quadrant. Each erosion room is lined by one to three lamellae of irregular thickness.</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0085">The compact cortex is primarily composed of primary parallel-fibered bone tissue internal to the fifth LAG (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>B, C; M346720; M346722), with lamellar bone external to the fifth LAG and flanking the growth marks. Internal to the first LAG, several bands of very distinct lamellae are visible in the posterior quadrant, which at low magnification resemble part of a multiple LAG. When viewed under polarized light or when focused through at higher magnification, it is clear that there are no tissue discontinuities, so they cannot be a multiple LAG. It is possible these bands represent an annulus, but they do not continue very far circumferentially. Additionally, the tibia preserves more primary bone in the cancellous region and has no equivalent bands, despite an otherwise identical distribution of growth marks (see below). Therefore, we hypothesize that the internal most LAG likely represents the first LAG deposited.</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0090">Twelve definitive cortical growth marks are preserved (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>A shows ten; M337274). The inner three are LAGs that locally become double or multiple LAGs (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>A, note arrows). The fourth is an annulus of lamellar bone with only local, short breaks in tissue. The outermost eight are closely spaced LAGs at the periphery of the bone; these are incompletely preserved around the periosteal circumference because of surface abrasion. The spacing of these seven zones is fairly consistent and the lamellar bone between them is largely avascular, so we interpret them as an external fundamental system (EFS) or outer circumferential layer (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>A, efs; M337274). The zones between growth marks are slightly wider approaching the adductor ridge.</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0095">In regions of parallel-fibered bone, the elongate osteocytes are arranged more or less circumferentially, but are irregularly spaced. In areas of lamellar bone, they are spaced more regularly and line up along lamellae. Endosteally, the osteocytes orbit vascular canals, but external to the third LAG, they do not (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>B; M346721; M346723).</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0100">Internal to the first LAG, the bone is moderately vascularized by longitudinal or slightly oblique primary osteons arranged in radial rows. Between the first and fifth LAGs, the distance between canals increases (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>A). This is especially noticeable in the posterodorsal quadrant, where they are arranged circumferentially or randomly rather than in radial rows. In this quadrant, about half of the canals are simple primary canals; elsewhere they comprise less than a quarter. External to the seventh LAG, the bone is nearly avascular. Anastomoses are rare throughout the section, but are slightly more common towards the adductor ridge. When present, they connect two canals radially. Secondary osteons are rare and only present internal to the first LAG; most secondary remodeling occurs in the form of erosion rooms.</p>
               </sec>
            </sec>
            <sec id="sec0055">
               <label>3.1.2</label>
               <title id="sect0075">Tibia</title>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0105">The mid-diaphyseal tibia is kidney-shaped in cross-section, with a small, subelliptical or V-shaped medullary cavity that sits centrally (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>D, mc). This odd cross-sectional shape results from a crest that runs diagonally across the anterior face of the tibial shaft (the “tibial crest” of <xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2013</xref>; <xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>C, D, cr); without it, the bone would be oval in cross-section. Cancellous and compact bone each comprises about half the radius except anteriorly, where the bone is nearly all compact. As in the femur, the innermost tibial LAG lies just outside the transition from cancellous to compact bone. In slide T2, only three erosion rooms are visible external to the first LAG (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>D), and in slide T1 (M339657) none cross it. Overall, the bone tissue is very similar to that of the femur.</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0110">A thick, irregular band of endosteal lamellae is visible in each section (M339657). Anteroventrally, the band is at least five times thicker than on the opposite side of the medullary cavity. In every slide, several oval erosion rooms pierce the endosteal lamellae; these may be lined or unlined. Within the cancellous bone, erosion rooms are largest and most irregular posteriorly. Dorsally and ventrally, they are circular or elliptical, with their long axes oriented radially (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>A). The size and density of erosion rooms decreases periosteally. As in the femur, the trabeculae formed by resorption of the primary compacta, and the original tissue is clearly visible between adjacent erosion rooms (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>B). Because the erosion rooms are smaller and unevenly distributed around the tibial circumference, more of the original compact tissue remains than in the femur.</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0115">The appearance and organization of collagen fibers and osteocytes, as well as the number, type, and relative spacing of the cortical growth marks are nearly identical to that of the femur. The only exception is the second growth mark, which is an annulus of lamellar bone for much of the tibial circumference rather than a LAG. The expansion of the anterior crest is greatest external to the fourth preserved growth mark (M339660); after this point, radial growth in the anterior direction exceeds radial growth elsewhere around the circumference.</p>
               </sec>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0120">The primary tissues internal to the first LAG are much better vascularized compared to the more external tissues. All canals are longitudinal primary osteons and they are arranged in a strong radial pattern. Anastomoses are extremely rare and only occur in the lateral quadrant, where they connect several canals radially. External to the first LAG, the primary osteons are arranged in two or three circumferential rows. Posteroventrally, a secondary signal of radial rows is visible between the first and fifth LAGs. External to the fifth LAG, the bone is avascular, except near the anterior crest; as for the femur, we interpret this region as an EFS (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>A).</p>
               </sec>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0060">
            <label>3.2</label>
            <title id="sect0080">Periosteal bone deposition rates</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0125">Radial periosteal bone deposition rates are reported in <xref rid="tbl0010" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref> (see SOM for raw data). In both elements, the highest growth rates occurred in the first year (i.e., internal to the first LAG). These rates range from 14.78–45.33 μm/d in the femur and 10.39–36.00 μm/d in the tibia (depending on the estimated length of the growth season), and, as a result, two thirds of total bone deposition occurred during the first year of growth (SOM). In both elements, bone deposition rates in the first year are seven to ten times higher than those of the second through fifth years (femur: 2.61–5.56 μm/d; tibia: 1.65–3.50 μm/d). In the final seven years of growth, less than a micron of bone was deposited per day, regardless of element or the growth duration assumed. In both elements, parallel-fibered bone is the main type of bone tissue deposited through year 5, and lamellar bone is deposited in years 6–12.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0065">
         <label>4</label>
         <title id="sect0085">Discussion</title>
         <sec id="sec0070">
            <label>4.1</label>
            <title id="sect0090">Bone deposition rates and growth duration in <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>
            </title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0130">To evaluate which growth duration (180, 270, 365, or 383 d/yr) is most reasonable for <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>, we compared estimated periosteal bone deposition rates during the time of fastest growth to known deposition rates from extant animals. In primary bone tissue, periosteal deposition rates vary with collagen fiber orientation; tissues with disorganized fibers (i.e., woven-fibered bone and fibrolamellar bone) are deposited more rapidly than more organized tissues (parallel-fibered bone and lamellar bone; <xref rid="bib0050" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2000a</xref>, <xref rid="bib0055" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2000b</xref>, <xref rid="bib0090" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil and Pascal, 1984</xref>, <xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2002</xref>, <xref rid="bib0130" ref-type="bibr">Enlow, 1969</xref>, <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2010</xref> and <xref rid="bib0280" ref-type="bibr">Newell-Morris and Sirianni, 1982</xref>). Parallel-fibered bone is the most disorganized tissue observed in <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>; it is the only bone tissue type deposited in the first five years of growth when zones are widest. We summarize parallel-fibered bone growth rates for the major long bones (humeri, femora and tibiae) of extant and extinct tetrapods in <xref rid="tbl0015" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0135">In the first year of growth, estimated deposition rates for the <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> femur and tibia exceed known deposition rates for parallel-fibered bone when a growth duration of 180 days and a neonate radius of 2.5 mm are assumed. If a neonate radius of 5 mm is used, estimated rates for this growth duration are similar to those observed in the mallard, <italic>Anas platyrhynchos</italic>; about 30 μm/d (<xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2002</xref>). In the mallard, such high deposition rates were only reported for parallel-fibered bone vascularized by primary osteons, which is the case internal to the first LAG in <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>. In years 2–5, bone depositions rates for <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> are comfortably within known bone deposition rates for extant taxa, regardless of which growth duration is assumed. These rates are most similar to those of <italic>Proterosuchus</italic> (sensu <xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</xref>), <italic>Alligator</italic>, and mammals. Thus, known bone deposition rates for parallel-fibered cannot be used to reject any of these growth durations, unless a very small neonate radius is assumed.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0140">Periosteal bone growth rates are strongly influenced by body mass, metabolism, and ontogenetic stage; they also vary by taxon, by element, and with resource availability (<xref rid="bib0030" ref-type="bibr">Castanet, 1985</xref>, <xref rid="bib0045" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1996</xref>, <xref rid="bib0050" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2000a</xref>, <xref rid="bib0055" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2000b</xref>, <xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Cubo et al., 2012</xref>, <xref rid="bib0090" ref-type="bibr">de Buffrénil and Pascal, 1984</xref>, <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2010</xref> and <xref rid="bib0325" ref-type="bibr">Starck and Chinsamy, 2002</xref>). Notably, the animals to which <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> is most similar are all either large-bodied (<italic>Proterosuchus</italic>, <italic>Alligator</italic>) or bradymetabolic (<italic>Anas</italic>, mammals). In <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>, the high depositional rates estimated in the first year of growth may be explained by size, metabolism, or a combination of both.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0075">
            <label>4.2</label>
            <title id="sect0095">Histological comparison with other rhynchosaurs</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0145">The only other rhynchosaur femora described histologically are that of <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic>. <xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al. (in press)</xref> described a single femur from the Santa Maria 2 Sequence (Upper Triassic) of Brazil, which was sectioned only from fragments near the proximal end (UFRGS PV-0271-T). These exhibit a thin cortex vascularized by longitudinal primary osteons that decrease in number periosteally, similar to NHMUK PV R 36618. The primary tissues of that specimen were described as fibrolamellar based on osteocyte shape and arrangement, and no growth marks were visible. Differences in femoral cortical thickness and growth mark presence between UFRGS PV-0271-T and NHMUK PV R 36618 partly reflect sampling location. In long bones, the cortex is always thickest at the mid-diaphysis and becomes much thinner towards the epiphyses. The mid-diaphysis also preserves the longest portion of the growth record, so fewer growth marks are visible at the ends of a bone.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0150">
                  <xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al. (in press)</xref> also described the mid-diaphyseal tibial histology of <italic>T. sulcognathus</italic> and <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> from the Santa Maria 2 Sequence in Brazil. They found that the cortices of smaller individuals were composed of fibrolamellar bone with a significant woven-fibered component. These tissues were well vascularized by primary osteons that anastomosed extensively to form plexiform patterns. Larger individuals sometimes preserved similar tissue in the perimedullary region, but their cortices were mainly composed of parallel-fibered bone, poorly vascularized by longitudinal primary osteons, and with several LAGs or annuli (<xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al., in press</xref>). In the largest individuals, the mid-diaphyseal cortex was very thin relative to both the diameter and to the cancellous inner tissues, and perimedullary secondary osteons were common. Other elements preserved an EFS, but these were not visible in the tibiae sectioned. These taxa differ from NHMUK PV R 36618 in the presence of fibrolamellar bone and in the complexity of vascular canal patterns.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0155">
                  <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee (2015)</xref> described femoral and tibial growth series from two species, <italic>H. huxleyi</italic> and <italic>H. tikiensis</italic>, from the Late Triassic Maleri Formation and Tiki Formation (respectively) of India. In both taxa, the inner cortex (internal to the first LAG) is composed entirely of woven-fibered or fibrolamellar bone. In <italic>H. tikiensis</italic>, this region is well vascularized by laminar or plexiform primary osteons. Porosity is much lower in <italic>H. huxleyi</italic>, but longitudinal primary osteons anastomose in all directions (<xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref>). After the first year, zonal width and porosity decrease, parallel-fibered bone becomes progressively more common than fibrolamellar bone, and the primary osteons are arranged circumferentially or in radial rows (similar to NHMUK PV R 36618). The outer cortex of older individuals is nearly avascular. As in other rhynchosaurs, annuli and LAGs are present. In the femora and tibiae, annuli are more common in earlier years (e.g., <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref>; fig. 4A); these are often flanked by LAGs in the mid and outer cortex (e.g., <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref>; fig. 6C, D). No EFS is reported for either taxon, but growth in the outermost cortex has clearly slowed has down dramatically into regular cycles of parallel-fibered zones and lamellar annuli flanked by LAGs (e.g., <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref>; fig. 6B; note that our interpretation of this pattern is slightly differs from that author's). These taxa differ from NHMUK PV R 36618 in the presence of woven-fibered bone, the persistence of parallel-fibered bone in the outermost cortex, and in the density and complexity of vascular canal patterns. These differences are most notable in <italic>H. tikiensis</italic>; <italic>H. huxleyi</italic> likely grew slower based on fibrillar organization, canal density, and extent of vascular anastomoses (<xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0160">Two additional specimens warrant discussion. <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al. (2008)</xref> described the histology of two “rib” shafts of <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> sp. (then <italic>Scaphonyx</italic>) from the Ischigualasto Formation (Upper Carnian) of Argentina. One had a typical rib lenticular cortical outline and histology, but the shape and histology of the other bone was so different that they questioned its identification. This specimen (MCZ FN 354-5, section 1.2.T) was larger and kidney-shaped, with a thick cortex. Its primary tissues were composed of parallel-fibered bone with distinct lamellar annuli ending in LAGs, and were much better vascularized than the other “rib”, especially endosteally. In the inner cortex of this specimen, vascular canals anastomosed frequently to form a sub-plexiform pattern (<xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al., 2008</xref>: plate 1, fig. 2). In <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>, no other limb elements are kidney-shaped in cross-section at mid-diaphysis (SW, personal obs.). Given its cross-sectional shape and histology, this specimen may be a tibial mid-diaphysis rather than a rib.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0165">The other noteworthy specimen is NMT RB154, a <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> sp. limb bone mid-diaphysis illustrated by <xref rid="bib0310" ref-type="bibr">Sanchez et al. (2012: fig. 4E, F)</xref>. Based on its histology and kidney shape in cross-section, it likely is also a tibia. This individual is smaller than NHMUK PV R 36618 (12.1 × 12.4 mm) and differs histologically in several ways. In NMT RB154, the cortical compacta is much thicker than the cancellous region. The primary cortex of NMT RB154 is comparably vascularized to the inner cortex of NHMUK PV R 36618, but has more radial and radially oblique anastomoses. Growth marks are present, but are less distinct than those of NHMUK PV R 36618. No information on the fibrillar organization is presented, and the sections are not illustrated at sufficient magnification to discern it. Both specimens have a small but distinct central medullary cavity.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0080">
            <label>4.3</label>
            <title id="sect0100">Ontogenetic trends in rhynchosaur histology and growth</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0170">In both the femur and tibia of NHMUK PV R 36618, two thirds of the bone deposition occurred in the first year (SOM). The combination of an intense first year of growth, followed by sharp decreases in bone deposition rate in the second and sixth years of growth, suggests that the growth curve for this individual attenuated dramatically with age. In other words, NHMUK PV R 36618 experienced determinate growth that approached an upper asymptote after only a few years. In this specimen, the outermost LAGs are incompletely preserved around the circumference of the bone because of surface abrasion. Unfortunately, it is impossible to measure their circumferences or to calculate age-circumference or age-mass growth curves for this individual because of surface abrasion and taphonomic fracturing.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0175">The transitions in <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> bone deposition rates are coincident with histological changes. In NHMUK PV R 36618, femoral and tibial vascularity are highest internal to the first LAG, which is also the only region that preserves anastomoses. Canal density declines in years 2-5, and the bone tissue in the outermost zones is nearly avascular. This observation is consistent with previous studies that found a link between canal density and bone growth rate in a variety of amniotes (e.g., <xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Cubo et al., 2012</xref> and <xref rid="bib0235" ref-type="bibr">Legendre et al., 2013</xref>). Similarly, the primary bone tissue of the innermost zone is mostly parallel-fibered. Moving periosteally, the tissues become progressively more lamellar. Previous studies have also shown that collagen fibers become more disorganized as bone deposition rate increases (e.g., <xref rid="bib0050" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2000a</xref>, <xref rid="bib0055" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2000b</xref> and <xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2002</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0180">Other rhynchosaurs may also have grown in a similar manner. <xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al. (in press)</xref> interpreted all sampled specimens of <italic>T. sulcognathus</italic> as adults (post-reproductive maturity, and near the end of growth). However, post-cranial measurements establish that the holotype, UFRGS PV-232-T, is much smaller than the two referred specimens, PV-298-T and PV-290-T (<xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2013</xref>). For example, the tibial mid-diaphysis of PV-232-T is half the diameter of PV-290-T and its humeral mid-diaphysis is two thirds the diameter of PV-290-T (<xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2013</xref> and <xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al., in press</xref>). The largest and most robust specimen, PV-290-T, has more developed articular surfaces than the other specimens (<xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2013</xref>). Their histology also supports interpretation as a partial ontogenetic series. PV-232-T is well vascularized in a plexiform pattern throughout the tibial cortex, and the transition from fibrolamellar to parallel-fibered bone occurs near the periosteal surface. In PV-290-T, the tibial cortex is poorly vascularized, the transition from fibrolamellar to parallel-fibered bone occurs in the innermost cortex, and secondary remodeling is much more extensive. PV-290-T does not preserve a tibia, but its humeral proximal diaphysis shows a mid-cortical transition in vascularization and fibrillar organization (<xref rid="bib0335" ref-type="bibr">Veiga et al., in press</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0185">
                  <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee (2015)</xref> reported a nearly identical pattern of growth in <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> from the Late Triassic of India. Both species experienced the greatest increase in bone circumference in the first year, during which they grew to approximately 1/3 adult size. The bone deposited in this time was woven-fibered or fibrolamellar bone and had both the greatest vascular density and the most complex vascular patterning. After this year, zonal width progressively decreased in size, the bone transitioned from woven- to parallel-fibered and ultimately to lamellar, and porosity decreased. The main difference between these species and the Brazilian taxa is that no EFS was reported in the Indian <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> (<xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0190">Despite differences in fibrillar organization and vascular patterning, <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> and the Upper Triassic rhynchosaurs share a common determinate growth pattern. The spacing between LAGs in all taxa sampled to date suggests faster initial growth lasting 1–2 growth seasons, followed by several years of dramatically slower growth, ultimately transitioning into an EFS in <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> and the Brazilian taxa. An EFS was not found in the Indian taxa, but growth rates strongly attenuated late in life. In all taxa, decreased annual bone deposition is mirrored histologically by changes in fibrillar organization and vascularity. In the innermost zones, collagen fibers are more disorganized and canals are more numerous and better connected. As the growth zones attenuate in width, the fibers become lamellar and canals decrease in number and connectivity. Because this general growth pattern is shared among several taxa, we disagree with <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee (2015)</xref> and hypothesize that most (perhaps all) rhynchosaurs reached their upper growth asymptote before death (i.e., that they experienced determinate growth).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0195">Among nonavian reptiles, determinate growth is known in a wide variety of taxa, including dinosaurs (e.g., <xref rid="bib0065" ref-type="bibr">Chinsamy, 1990</xref>, <xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Erickson et al., 2004</xref>, <xref rid="bib0195" ref-type="bibr">Horner et al., 2009</xref> and <xref rid="bib0230" ref-type="bibr">Lee and O’Connor, 2013</xref>), pseudosuchian archosaurs (<xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">de Ricqlès et al., 2008</xref>, <xref rid="bib0330" ref-type="bibr">Tucker et al., 2007</xref> and <xref rid="bib0365" ref-type="bibr">Woodward et al., 2011</xref>), lepidosaurs (<xref rid="bib0025" ref-type="bibr">Bronikowski and Arnold, 1999</xref>, <xref rid="bib0040" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1988</xref>, <xref rid="bib0200" ref-type="bibr">Hugi and Sánchez-Villagra, 2012</xref> and <xref rid="bib0220" ref-type="bibr">Lailvaux et al., 2004</xref>), turtles (<xref rid="bib0075" ref-type="bibr">Congdon et al., 2001</xref>), and sauropterygians (<xref rid="bib0205" ref-type="bibr">Hugi et al., 2011</xref>, <xref rid="bib0210" ref-type="bibr">Klein, 2010a</xref> and <xref rid="bib0215" ref-type="bibr">Klein, 2010b</xref>). It is also known in some fish (<xref rid="bib0290" ref-type="bibr">Okuda et al., 1998</xref>) and in all three extant amphibian clades (<xref rid="bib0175" ref-type="bibr">Haft and Franzen, 1996</xref>, <xref rid="bib0180" ref-type="bibr">Hanken, 1982</xref>, <xref rid="bib0240" ref-type="bibr">Martof, 1956</xref> and <xref rid="bib0375" ref-type="bibr">Woolbright, 1989</xref>). Determinate growth is not universal, and many taxa (especially among poikilotherms) do not commonly reach asymptotic size before death in the wild. However, we are not aware of any tetrapod species that does not attenuate growth toward an asymptote late in life. In this context, the determinate growth observed in <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> and other rhynchosaurs is not surprising.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
         <sec id="sec0085">
            <label>4.4</label>
            <title id="sect0105">Long bone histological variation within non-archosauriform archosauromorpha</title>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0200">Despite sharing a similar determinate growth trajectory, rhynchosaurs varied somewhat histologically (at least based on tibial comparisons), and by extension, in their inferred relative growth rates. Of the taxa discussed here, <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> shows numerous signs of slower growth compared to <italic>Teyumbaita</italic> and <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> from Brazil and India. Unlike those taxa, it does not preserve woven-fibered or fibrolamellar bone, even in the innermost cortex (i.e., the tissues deposited when the animal was young and growing fastest). Compared to these taxa, <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> is less vascularized throughout the cortex, and lacks anastomoses except early in life. Even then, the vascular patterns are never as complex or extensive as in the other taxa. The histology of the Argentinian <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> is intermediate to these conditions: like NHMUK PV R 26618, it lacks woven-fibered bone, but it shares more complex vascular patterns with <italic>Teyumbaita</italic> and the other <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic>, at least earlier in ontogeny. Because the phylogenetic relationships within Hyperodapedontidae are poorly resolved (<xref rid="fig0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>B) and there is variation even within the genus <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic>, the plesiomorphic condition for growth in this clade, and for Rhynchosauria, currently cannot be resolved.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0205">Long bone histological variation is also present among the other non-archosauriform archosauromorphs. The protorosaur <italic>Aenigmastropheus parringtoni</italic> from the middle Late Permian of Tanzania showed histological signs of accelerated growth rates in the innermost humeral cortex, including moderately high levels of vascularization and woven-fibered bone tissue (<xref rid="bib0145" ref-type="bibr">Ezcurra et al., 2014</xref>). However, most of the cortex was composed of much slower-growing tissues (e.g., parallel-fibered or lamellar bone with infrequent canal anastomoses; <xref rid="bib0145" ref-type="bibr">Ezcurra et al., 2014</xref>), suggesting that it grew at much slower rates for most of its life. <italic>Trilophosaurus buettneri</italic> from the Upper Triassic of Texas, USA, deposited nearly avascular lamellar bone throughout ontogeny; its tissue suggests very slow growth similar to that of extant lepidosauromorphs (<xref rid="bib0355" ref-type="bibr">Werning and Irmis, 2011</xref>). <xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith (2011)</xref> described the tibial histology of the close relative of archosauriforms <italic>Prolacerta broomi</italic>, and found poorly vascularized and only very weakly woven or parallel-fibered bone tissue, consistent with moderate growth rates.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <p id="par0210">The long bone microstructure of non-archosauriform archosauromorphs generally suggests slower growth compared to archosauriforms. All sampled taxa (including rhynchosaurs) deposited moderately to poorly vascularized parallel-fibered or lamellar bone for a significant portion of their ontogeny, and we agree with others (<xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</xref>, <xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Cubo et al., 2012</xref> and <xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref>) that this was likely the plesiomorphic condition for Archosauromorpha. However, among non-archosauriform archosauromorphs, only <italic>H. tikiensis</italic> (<xref rid="bib0265" ref-type="bibr">Mukherjee, 2015</xref>) and <italic>Trilophosaurus buettneri</italic> (<xref rid="bib0355" ref-type="bibr">Werning and Irmis, 2011</xref>), have been sampled sufficiently and systematically to the level to confidently address ontogenetic and inter-elemental variation in growth and histology and data for the latter have only been published in conference abstracts. Also, <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> and <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic> are the only non-archosauriform archosauromorph taxa for which specimens from more than one locality have been sampled. Broader phylogenetic, ontogenetic, and regional sampling may reveal additional histological and physiological variation than is currently described.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0090">
         <label>5</label>
         <title id="sect0110">Conclusions</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0215">The long bone histology of <italic>S</italic>. <italic>stockleyi</italic> suggests relatively slow growth compared to archosauriforms, saurischian dinosaurs, or birds, consistent with its phylogenetic position as a non-archosauriform archosauromorph. The sampled individual experienced much higher rates of bone deposition in its first year compared to subsequent years, which ultimately end in an EFS. These trends were concomitant with histological changes that also suggest slowing growth, such as increasing fibrillar organization and decreasing vascularity moving periosteally. Similar changes occur in the rhynchosaurs <italic>T. sulcognathus</italic>, <italic>H. tikiensis</italic>, and <italic>H. huxleyi</italic>, suggesting that rhynchosaurs in general experienced a short initial burst of faster growth, followed by an extended period of slow growth. The presence of attenuating LAGs and an EFS suggests asymptotic growth for this taxon, with maximum body size reached during the animal's lifetime. This is notably dissimilar to Archosauriformes and in particular bird-line archosaurs (especially saurischian dinosaurs), whose long bones show histological signs of sustained elevated growth lasting several years.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0220">Histological variation among different rhynchosaur clades serves as a caution against inferring a common growth rate among closely related taxa, even when the overall shape of the growth curve is similar. Because Rhynchosauria as a clade was geographically widespread, had a temporal duration that lasted about 20 million years, and was ecologically diverse, and because several rhynchosaur taxa (including <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>) are known from partial ontogenetic series, they are an ideal group for continued studies of bone histology and growth.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
   </body>
   <back>
      <ack>
         <title id="sect0115">Acknowledgments</title>
         <p id="par0230">This material is based upon work supported by the <funding-source id="gs0005">
               <institution-wrap>
                  <institution>National Science Foundation</institution>
                  <institution-id>http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001</institution-id>
               </institution-wrap>
            </funding-source> under award numbers <award-id award-type="grant" rid="gs0005">EAR-1250123</award-id> (to S.W.) and <award-id award-type="grant" rid="gs0010">EAR-1337291</award-id> (<funding-source id="gs0010">
               <institution-wrap>
                  <institution>Earth-Life Transitions</institution>
               </institution-wrap>
            </funding-source>; to Kenneth D. Angielczyk and S.J.N.), as well as the <funding-source id="gs0015">
               <institution-wrap>
                  <institution>Jurassic Foundation</institution>
               </institution-wrap>
            </funding-source> (to S.W.). We thank Paul Barrett and Sandra Chapman at NHMUK for access to specimens and permission to sample histologically. We also thank the University of California Museum of Paleontology, University of Texas Vertebrate Paleontology Lab, and Stony Brook University for access to thin sectioning equipment, and Alan Turner, Timothy Bromage and the Hard Tissue Research Unit (New York University) for access to imaging equipment. We also thank our reviewers, Holly Woodward and Torsten Scheyer, and our editor, Michel Laurin, for their helpful comments that improved our manuscript.</p>
      </ack>
      <app-group>
         <app>
            <sec id="sec0105">
               <label>Appendix A</label>
               <title id="sect0125">Supplementary data</title>
               <sec>
                  <p id="par0240">
                     <supplementary-material xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="upi0005" xlink:href="main.assets/mmc1.xlsx"/>
                     <supplementary-material xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" id="upi0010" xlink:href="main.assets/mmc2.xlsx"/>
                  </p>
               </sec>
            </sec>
         </app>
      </app-group>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="bib0005">
            <label>Benton, 1983</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0005" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Benton</surname>
                  <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The Triassic reptile <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> from Elgin: functional morphology and relationships</article-title>
               <source>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B</source>
               <volume>302</volume>
               <year>1983</year>
               <page-range>605–717</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0010">
            <label>Benton, 1984</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0010" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Benton</surname>
                  <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The relationships and early evolution of the Diapsida</article-title>
               <source>Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond.</source>
               <volume>52</volume>
               <year>1984</year>
               <page-range>575–596</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0020">
            <label>Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0020" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Botha-Brink</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Smith</surname>
                  <given-names>R.M.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Osteohistology of the Triassic archosauromorphs <italic>Prolacerta</italic>, <italic>Proterosuchus, Euparkeria</italic>, and <italic>Erythrosuchus</italic> from the Karoo Basin of South Africa</article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>31</volume>
               <year>2011</year>
               <page-range>1238–1254</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0025">
            <label>Bronikowski and Arnold, 1999</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0025" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Bronikowski</surname>
                  <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Arnold</surname>
                  <given-names>S.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The evolutionary ecology of life history variation in the garter snake <italic>Thamnophis elegans</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>Ecol.</source>
               <volume>80</volume>
               <year>1999</year>
               <page-range>2314–2325</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0030">
            <label>Castanet, 1985</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0030" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>La squelettochronologie chez les reptiles. I. Résultats expérimentaux sur la signification des marques de croissance squelettiques chez les lézards et les tortues (1)</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., Paris</source>
               <volume>7</volume>
               <year>1985</year>
               <page-range>23–40</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0035">
            <label>Castanet and Baez, 1991</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0035" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Baez</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Adaptation and evolution in <italic>Gallotia</italic> lizards from the Canary Islands: age, growth, maturity and longevity</article-title>
               <source>Amphibia-Reptilia</source>
               <volume>12</volume>
               <year>1991</year>
               <page-range>81–102</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0040">
            <label>Castanet et al., 1988</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0040" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Newman</surname>
                  <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Saint Girons</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Skeletochronological data on the growth, age, and population structure of the tuatara, <italic>Sphenodon punctatus</italic>, on Stephens and Lady Alice Islands, New Zealand</article-title>
               <source>Herpetologica</source>
               <volume>44</volume>
               <year>1988</year>
               <page-range>25–37</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0045">
            <label>Castanet et al., 1996</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0045" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Grandin</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Abourachid</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Expression de la dynamique de croissance dans la structure de l’os périostique chez <italic>Anas platyrhynchos</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. III</source>
               <volume>319</volume>
               <year>1996</year>
               <page-range>301–308</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0050">
            <label>Castanet et al., 2000a</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0050" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pinto</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Loth</surname>
                  <given-names>M.-M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lamotte</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Âge individuel, longévité et dynamique de croissance osseuse chez un amphibien vivipare, <italic>Nectophrynoides occidentalis</italic> (Anoure, Bufonidae)</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Sci. Nat.</source>
               <volume>21</volume>
               <year>2000</year>
               <page-range>11–17</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0055">
            <label>Castanet et al., 2000b</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0055" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rogers</surname>
                  <given-names>K.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Jacques-Boisard</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Periosteal bone growth rates in extant ratites (ostriche and emu). Implications for assessing growth in dinosaurs</article-title>
               <source>C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. III</source>
               <volume>323</volume>
               <year>2000</year>
               <page-range>543–550</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0380">
            <label>Castanet et al., 2004</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0380" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Croci</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Aujard</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Perret</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Margerie</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Lines of arrested growth in bone and age estimation in a small primate: Microcebus murinus</article-title>
               <source>J. Zool., Lond.</source>
               <volume>263</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>31–39</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0060">
            <label>Chatterjee, 1974</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0060" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Chatterjee</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A rhyncosaur from the Upper Triassic Maleri Formation of India</article-title>
               <source>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B</source>
               <volume>267</volume>
               <year>1974</year>
               <page-range>209–261</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0065">
            <label>Chinsamy, 1990</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0065" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Chinsamy</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Physiological implications of the bone histology of <italic>Syntarsus rhodesiensis</italic> (Saurischia: Theropoda)</article-title>
               <source>Palaeontol. Afr.</source>
               <volume>27</volume>
               <year>1990</year>
               <page-range>77–82</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0070">
            <label>Chinsamy et al., 1995</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0070" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Chinsamy</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Chiappe</surname>
                  <given-names>L.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Dodson</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Mesozoic avian bone microstructure: physiological implications</article-title>
               <source>Paleobiology</source>
               <volume>21</volume>
               <year>1995</year>
               <page-range>561–574</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0075">
            <label>Congdon et al., 2001</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0075" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Congdon</surname>
                  <given-names>J.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Nagle</surname>
                  <given-names>R.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kinney</surname>
                  <given-names>O.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>van Loben Sels</surname>
                  <given-names>R.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Hypothesis of aging in a long-lived vertebrate, Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingii)</article-title>
               <source>Exper. Gerontol.</source>
               <volume>36</volume>
               <year>2001</year>
               <page-range>813–827</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0080">
            <label>Cox, 1991</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0080" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cox</surname>
                  <given-names>C.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The Pangaea dicynodont <italic>Rechnisaurus</italic> and the comparative biostratigraphy of Triassic dicynodonts faunas</article-title>
               <source>Palaeontology</source>
               <volume>34</volume>
               <year>1991</year>
               <page-range>767–784</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0085">
            <label>Cubo et al., 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0085" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Le Roy</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Martinez-Maza</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Montes</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Paleohistological estimation of bone growth rate in extinct archosaurs</article-title>
               <source>Paleobiology</source>
               <volume>38</volume>
               <year>2012</year>
               <page-range>335–349</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0090">
            <label>de Buffrénil and Pascal, 1984</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0090" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pascal</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Croissance et morphogenèse postnatales de la mandibule du vison (<italic>Mustela vison</italic> Schreiber) : données sur la dynamique et l’interprétation fonctionnelle des dépôts osseux mandibulaires</article-title>
               <source>Can. J. Zool.</source>
               <volume>62</volume>
               <year>1984</year>
               <page-range>2026–2037</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0385">
            <label>de Buffrénil et al., 2015</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0385" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Clarac</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Fau</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Martin</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Martin</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pellé</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Laurin</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Differentiation and growth of bone ornamentation in vertebrates: A comparative histological study among the Crocodylomorpha</article-title>
               <source>J. Morphol.</source>
               <volume>276</volume>
               <year>2015</year>
               <page-range>425–445</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0100">
            <label>de Margerie et al., 2002</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0100" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Margerie</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone typology and growth rate: testing and quantifying ‘Amprino's rule’ in the mallard (<italic>Anas platyrhynchos</italic>)</article-title>
               <source>C. R. Biologies</source>
               <volume>325</volume>
               <year>2002</year>
               <page-range>221–230</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0105">
            <label>de Ricqlès, 1976</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0105" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>On bone histology of fossil and living reptiles, with comments on its functional and evolutionary significance</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bellairs</surname>
                  <given-names>A.d’A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cox</surname>
                  <given-names>C.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Morphology and Biology of Reptiles</article-title>
               <year>1976</year>
               <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>123–151</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0110">
            <label>de Ricqlès et al., 2003</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0110" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>On the bone histology of some Triassic pseudosuchian archosaurs and related taxa</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>89</volume>
               <year>2003</year>
               <page-range>67–101</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0115">
            <label>de Ricqlès et al., 2008</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0115" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Knoll</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>On the origin of high growth rates in archosaurs and their ancient relatives: complementary histological studies on Triassic archosauriforms and the problem of a “phylogenetic signal” in bone histology</article-title>
               <source>Ann. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>94</volume>
               <year>2008</year>
               <page-range>57–76</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0120">
            <label>Dilkes, 1995</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0120" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Dilkes</surname>
                  <given-names>D.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The rhynchosaur <italic>Howesia browni</italic> from the Lower Triassic of South Africa</article-title>
               <source>Palaeontology</source>
               <volume>38</volume>
               <year>1995</year>
               <page-range>665–685</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0125">
            <label>Dilkes, 1998</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0125" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Dilkes</surname>
                  <given-names>D.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The Early Triassic rhynchosaur <italic>Mesosuchus browni</italic> and the interrelationships of basal archosauromorph reptiles</article-title>
               <source>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B</source>
               <volume>353</volume>
               <year>1998</year>
               <page-range>501–541</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0130">
            <label>Enlow, 1969</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0130" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Enlow</surname>
                  <given-names>D.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The bone of reptiles</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gans</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bellairs</surname>
                  <given-names>A.d’A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Parsons</surname>
                  <given-names>T.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Biology of the Reptilia</source>
               <volume>Vol. 1 Morphology A</volume>
               <year>1969</year>
               <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>45–80</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0135">
            <label>Enlow and Brown, 1957</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0135" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Enlow</surname>
                  <given-names>D.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Brown</surname>
                  <given-names>S.O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues. Part II</article-title>
               <source>Texas J. Sci.</source>
               <volume>9</volume>
               <year>1957</year>
               <page-range>186–214</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0140">
            <label>Erickson et al., 2004</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0140" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Erickson</surname>
                  <given-names>G.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Makovicky</surname>
                  <given-names>P.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Currie</surname>
                  <given-names>P.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Norell</surname>
                  <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Yerby</surname>
                  <given-names>S.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Brochu</surname>
                  <given-names>C.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Gigantism and comparative life-history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs</article-title>
               <source>Nature</source>
               <volume>430</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>772–775</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0145">
            <label>Ezcurra et al., 2014</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0145" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Ezcurra</surname>
                  <given-names>M.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Scheyer</surname>
                  <given-names>T.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Butler</surname>
                  <given-names>R.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The origin and early evolution of Sauria: reassessing the Permian saurian fossil record and the timing of the crocodile-lizard divergence</article-title>
               <source>PLoS ONE</source>
               <volume>9</volume>
               <year>2014</year>
               <page-range>e89165</page-range>
               <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0089165</pub-id>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0150">
            <label>Francillon, 1979</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0150" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Francillon</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Étude expérimentale des marques de croissance sur les humérus et les fémurs de tritons crêtés (<italic>Triturus cristatus cristatus</italic> Laurenti) en relation avec la détermination de l’âge individuel</article-title>
               <source>Acta Zool. (Stockh.)</source>
               <volume>60</volume>
               <year>1979</year>
               <page-range>223–232</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0155">
            <label>Francillon-Vieillot et al., 1990</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0155" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Francillon-Vieillot</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Géraudie</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Meunier</surname>
                  <given-names>F.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sire</surname>
                  <given-names>J.Y.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Zylerberg</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Microstructure and mineralization of vertebrate skeletal tissues</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Carter</surname>
                  <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Skeletal biomineralization: patterns, processes and evolutionary trends</source>
               <volume>1</volume>
               <year>1990</year>
               <publisher-name>Van Nostrand Reinhold</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>471–530</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0160">
            <label>Griffin and Nesbitt, In revision</label>
            <mixed-citation id="oref0160">Griffin, C.T., Nesbitt, S.J., In revision. The femoral ontogeny and long bone histology of the Middle Triassic (?Late Anisian) dinosauriform <italic>Asilisaurus kongwe</italic> and implications for the growth of early dinosaurs. J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0165">
            <label>Gross, 1934</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0165" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Gross</surname>
                  <given-names>W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Die Typen des mikroskopischen Knochenbaues bei fossilen Stegocephalen und Reptilien</article-title>
               <source>Z. Anat. Entwicklungs.</source>
               <volume>203</volume>
               <year>1934</year>
               <page-range>731–764</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0170">
            <label>Gower, 2003</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0170" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Gower</surname>
                  <given-names>D.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Osteology of the early archosaurian reptile <italic>Erythrosuchus africanus</italic> Broom</article-title>
               <source>Ann. South Afr. Mus.</source>
               <volume>110</volume>
               <year>2003</year>
               <page-range>1–88</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0175">
            <label>Haft and Franzen, 1996</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0175" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Haft</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Franzen</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Freilandbeobachtungen, Verhalten und Nachzucht der São Tomé-Blindwühle <italic>Schistometopum thomense</italic> (Bocage, 1873)</article-title>
               <source>Herpetofauna</source>
               <volume>18</volume>
               <year>1996</year>
               <page-range>5–11</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0180">
            <label>Hanken, 1982</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0180" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Hanken</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Appendicular skeletal morphology in minute salamanders, genus <italic>Thorius</italic> (Amphibia: Plethodontidae): growth regulation, adult size determination, and natural variation</article-title>
               <source>J. Morphol.</source>
               <volume>174</volume>
               <year>1982</year>
               <page-range>57–77</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0185">
            <label>Haughton, 1932</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0185" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Haughton</surname>
                  <given-names>S.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>On a collectionof Karroo vertebrates from Tanganyika Territory</article-title>
               <source>Quart. J. Geol. Soc.</source>
               <volume>88</volume>
               <year>1932</year>
               <page-range>634–671</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0190">
            <label>Horner et al., 2001</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0190" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Comparative osteohistology of some embryonic and perinatal archosaurs: developmental and behavioral implications for dinosaurs</article-title>
               <source>Paleobiology</source>
               <volume>27</volume>
               <year>2001</year>
               <page-range>39–58</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0195">
            <label>Horner et al., 2009</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0195" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Scheetz</surname>
                  <given-names>R.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Comparative long bone histology and growth of the “hypsilophodontid” dinosaurs <italic>Orodromeus makelai</italic>, <italic>Dryosaurus altus</italic>, and <italic>Tenontosaurus tillettii</italic> (Ornithischia: Euornithopoda)</article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>29</volume>
               <year>2009</year>
               <page-range>734–747</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0200">
            <label>Hugi and Sánchez-Villagra, 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0200" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Hugi</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sánchez-Villagra</surname>
                  <given-names>M.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Life history and skeletal adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana (<italic>Amblyrhynchus cristatus</italic>) as reconstructed with bone histological data – A comparative study of iguanines</article-title>
               <source>J. Herpetol.</source>
               <volume>36</volume>
               <year>2012</year>
               <page-range>312–324</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0205">
            <label>Hugi et al., 2011</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0205" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Hugi</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Scheyer</surname>
                  <given-names>T.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sander</surname>
                  <given-names>P.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Klein</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sánchez-Villagra</surname>
                  <given-names>M.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Long bone microstructure gives new insights into the life of pachypleurosaurids from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio, Switzerland/Italy</article-title>
               <source>C. R. Palevol</source>
               <volume>10</volume>
               <year>2011</year>
               <page-range>413–426</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0210">
            <label>Klein, 2010a</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0210" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Klein</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Long bone histology of Sauropterygia from the Lower Muschelkalk of the Germanic Basin provides unexpected implications for phylogeny</article-title>
               <source>PLoS ONE</source>
               <volume>5</volume>
               <issue>7</issue>
               <year>2010</year>
               <page-range>e11613</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0215">
            <label>Klein, 2010b</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0215" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Klein</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Long bone histology of Sauropterygia from the Lower Muschelkalk of the Germanic Basin, provides unexpected implications for phylogeny</article-title>
               <source>PloS ONE</source>
               <year>2010</year>
               <page-range>e11613</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0220">
            <label>Lailvaux et al., 2004</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0220" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lailvaux</surname>
                  <given-names>S.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Herrel</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>VanHooydonck</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Meyers</surname>
                  <given-names>J.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Irschick</surname>
                  <given-names>D.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Performance capacity, fighting tactics and the evolution of life-stage male morphs in the Green Anole lizard (<italic>Anolis carolinensis</italic>)</article-title>
               <source>Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B</source>
               <volume>263</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>559–566</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0225">
            <label>Lamm, 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0225" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lamm</surname>
                  <given-names>E.-T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Preparation and sectioning of specimens</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lamm</surname>
                  <given-names>E.-T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone histology of fossil tetrapods</article-title>
               <year>2013</year>
               <publisher-name>University of California Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Berkeley</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>55–160</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0230">
            <label>Lee and O’Connor, 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0230" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lee</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>O’Connor</surname>
                  <given-names>P.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone histology confirms determinate growth and small body size in the noasaurid theropod <italic>Masiakasaurus knopfleri</italic>
               </article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>33</volume>
               <year>2013</year>
               <page-range>865–876</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0235">
            <label>Legendre et al., 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0235" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Legendre</surname>
                  <given-names>L.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Segalen</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Evidence for high bone growth rate in <italic>Euparkeria</italic> obtained using a new paleohistological inference model for the humerus</article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>33</volume>
               <year>2013</year>
               <page-range>1343–1350</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0240">
            <label>Martof, 1956</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0240" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Martof</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Growth and development of the Green Frog, <italic>Rana clamitans</italic>, under natural conditions</article-title>
               <source>Am. Midland Nat.</source>
               <volume>55</volume>
               <year>1956</year>
               <page-range>101–117</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0245">
            <label>Montefeltro et al., 2010</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0245" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Montefeltro</surname>
                  <given-names>F.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Langer</surname>
                  <given-names>M.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schultz</surname>
                  <given-names>C.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Cranial anatomy of a new genus of hyperodapedontine rhynchosaur (Diapsida, Archosauromorpha) from the Upper Triassic of southern Brazil</article-title>
               <source>Earth Env. Sci. T. Roy. Soc. Edin.</source>
               <volume>101</volume>
               <year>2010</year>
               <page-range>27–52</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0250">
            <label>Montefeltro et al., 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0250" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Montefeltro</surname>
                  <given-names>F.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bittencourt</surname>
                  <given-names>J.S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Langer</surname>
                  <given-names>M.C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schultz</surname>
                  <given-names>C.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Postcranial anatomy of the hyperodapedontine rhynchosaur <italic>Teyumbaita sulcognathus</italic> (Azevedo and Schultz, 1987) from the Late Triassic of Southern Brazil</article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>33</volume>
               <year>2013</year>
               <page-range>67–84</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0255">
            <label>Montes et al., 2007</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0255" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Montes</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Le Roy</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Perret</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Buffrénil</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Relationships between bone growth rate, body mass and resting metabolic rate in growing amniotes: a phylogenetic approach</article-title>
               <source>Biol. J. Linn. Soc.</source>
               <volume>92</volume>
               <year>2007</year>
               <page-range>63–76</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0260">
            <label>Montes et al., 2010</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0260" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Montes</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Castanet</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cubo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Relationship between bone growth rate and bone tissue organization in amniotes: first test of Amprino's rule in a phylogenetic context</article-title>
               <source>An. Biol.</source>
               <volume>60</volume>
               <year>2010</year>
               <page-range>25–41</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0265">
            <label>Mukherjee, 2015</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0265" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Mukherjee</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>New insights from bone microanatomy of the Late Triassic <italic>Hyperodapedon</italic> (Archosauromorpha, Rhynchosauria): implications for archosauromorph growth strategy</article-title>
               <source>Palaeontology</source>
               <volume>58</volume>
               <year>2015</year>
               <page-range>313–339</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0270">
            <label>Nesbitt et al., 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0270" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Nesbitt</surname>
                  <given-names>S.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Barrett</surname>
                  <given-names>P.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Werning</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sidor</surname>
                  <given-names>C.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Charig</surname>
                  <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The oldest dinosaur? A Middle Triassic dinosauriform from Tanzania</article-title>
               <source>Biol. Lett.</source>
               <volume>9</volume>
               <year>2013</year>
               <page-range>20120949</page-range>
               <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsbl.2012.0949</pub-id>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0275">
            <label>Nesbitt et al., in revision</label>
            <mixed-citation id="oref0275">Nesbitt, S.J., Flynn, J.J., Pritchard, A.C., Parrish, J.M., Ranivoharimanana, L., Wyss., A.R., in revision. Postcranial osteology of <italic>Azendohsaurus madagaskarensis</italic> (?Middle to Upper Triassic, Isalo Group, Madagascar) and its systematic position among stem archosaur reptiles. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0280">
            <label>Newell-Morris and Sirianni, 1982</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0280" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Newell-Morris</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sirianni</surname>
                  <given-names>J.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Parameters of bone growth in the fetal and infant macaque (<italic>Macaca nemestrina</italic>) humerus as documented by trichromatic bone labels</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Dixon</surname>
                  <given-names>A.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sarnat</surname>
                  <given-names>B.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Factors and Mechanisms Influencing Bone Growth, Progress in Clinical &amp; Biological Research 101</article-title>
               <year>1982</year>
               <publisher-name>Alan R Liss, Inc</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>243–258</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0285">
            <label>O’Leary and Kaufman, 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0285" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>O’Leary</surname>
                  <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kaufman</surname>
                  <given-names>S.G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>MorphoBank 3. 0: web application for morphological phylogenetics and taxonomy</source>
               <year>2012</year>
               <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.morphobank.org/">http://www.morphobank.org</ext-link>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0290">
            <label>Okuda et al., 1998</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0290" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Okuda</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Tayasu</surname>
                  <given-names>I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Yanagisawa</surname>
                  <given-names>Y.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Determinate growth in a paternal mouthbrooding fish whose reproductive success is limited by buccal capacity</article-title>
               <source>Evol. Ecol.</source>
               <volume>12</volume>
               <year>1998</year>
               <page-range>681–699</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0295">
            <label>Padian et al., 2004</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0295" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>de Ricqlès</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Growth in small dinosaurs and pterosaurs: the evolution of archosaurian growth strategies</article-title>
               <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <volume>24</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>555–571</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0300">
            <label>Peabody, 1961</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0300" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Peabody</surname>
                  <given-names>F.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Annual growth zones in living and fossil vertebrates</article-title>
               <source>J. Morphol.</source>
               <volume>108</volume>
               <year>1961</year>
               <page-range>11–62</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0305">
            <label>Roberts et al., 1988</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0305" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Roberts</surname>
                  <given-names>E.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Matlock</surname>
                  <given-names>C.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Joanen</surname>
                  <given-names>T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>McNease</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bowen</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone morphometrics and tetracycline marking patterns in young growing American alligators (<italic>Alligator mississippiensis</italic>)</article-title>
               <source>J. Wildlife Dis.</source>
               <volume>24</volume>
               <year>1988</year>
               <page-range>67–70</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0310">
            <label>Sanchez et al., 2012</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0310" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Sanchez</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Ahlberg</surname>
                  <given-names>P.E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Trinajstic</surname>
                  <given-names>K.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Mirone</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Tafforeau</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Three-dimensional synchrotron virtual paleohistology: a new insight into the world of fossil bone microstructures</article-title>
               <source>Microsc. Microanal.</source>
               <volume>18</volume>
               <year>2012</year>
               <page-range>1095–1105</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0315">
            <label>Scheyer et al., 2014</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0315" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Scheyer</surname>
                  <given-names>T.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Desojo</surname>
                  <given-names>J.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cerda</surname>
                  <given-names>I.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone histology of phytosaur, aetosaur, and other archosauriform osteoderms (Eureptilia, Archosauromorpha)</article-title>
               <source>Anat. Rec.</source>
               <volume>297</volume>
               <year>2014</year>
               <page-range>240–260</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0320">
            <label>Seitz, 1907</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0320" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Seitz</surname>
                  <given-names>A.L.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Vergleichende Studien über den mikroskopischen Knochenbau fossiler und rezenter Reptilien und dessen Bedeutung für das Wachstum und Umbildung des Knochengewebes im allgemeinen</article-title>
               <source>Nova Acta. Abh. K. Leop. -Carol. Deutsch. Akad. Naturf.</source>
               <volume>87</volume>
               <year>1907</year>
               <page-range>230–370</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0325">
            <label>Starck and Chinsamy, 2002</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0325" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Starck</surname>
                  <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Chinsamy</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Bone microstructure and developmental plasticity in birds and other dinosaurs</article-title>
               <source>J. Morphol.</source>
               <volume>254</volume>
               <year>2002</year>
               <page-range>232–246</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0330">
            <label>Tucker et al., 2007</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0330" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Tucker</surname>
                  <given-names>A.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Limpus</surname>
                  <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>McDonald</surname>
                  <given-names>K.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>McCallum</surname>
                  <given-names>H.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Growth dynamics of freshwater crocodiles (<italic>Crocodylus johnstoni</italic>) in the Lynd River, Queensland</article-title>
               <source>Austral. J. Zool.</source>
               <volume>54</volume>
               <year>2007</year>
               <page-range>409–415</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0335">
            <label>Veiga et al., in press</label>
            <mixed-citation id="oref0335">Veiga, F., Soares, M.B., Sayão, J.M., in press. Osteohistology of hyperodapedontine rhynchosaurs from the Upper Triassic of southern Brazil. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. Online in advance of print. doi: 10.4202/app.00074.2014.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0340">
            <label>von Huene, 1938</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0340" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>von Huene</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Stenaulorhynchus, ein Rhynchosauride der ostafrikanischen Obertrias</article-title>
               <source>Nova Acta Leopoldina (N.F.)</source>
               <volume>6</volume>
               <year>1938</year>
               <page-range>83–112</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0345">
            <label>Wells, 1963</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0345" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Wells</surname>
                  <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Coral growth and geochronometry</article-title>
               <source>Nature</source>
               <volume>197</volume>
               <year>1963</year>
               <page-range>948–950</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0350">
            <label>Werning, 2013</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0350" publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Werning</surname>
                  <given-names>S.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Evolution of Bone Histological Characters in Amniotes and the Implications for the Evolution of Growth and Metabolism</source>
               <comment>Unpublished PhD Dissertation</comment>
               <year>2013</year>
               <publisher-name>University of California</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Berkeley</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0355">
            <label>Werning and Irmis, 2011</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0355" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Werning</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Irmis</surname>
                  <given-names>R.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Reconstructing the ontogeny of the Triassic basal archosauromorph <italic>Trilophosaurus</italic> using bone histology and limb bone morphometrics. Program and Abstracts, 70th Annual Meeting</article-title>
               <source>Soc. Vertebr. Paleontol.</source>
               <year>2011</year>
               <page-range>185A–186A</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0360">
            <label>Werning et al., 2011</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0360" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Werning</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Irmis</surname>
                  <given-names>R.B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Nesbitt</surname>
                  <given-names>S.J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Smith</surname>
                  <given-names>N.D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Turner</surname>
                  <given-names>A.H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Padian</surname>
                  <given-names>K.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Archosauromorph bone histology reveals early evolution of elevated growth and metabolic rates</article-title>
               <source>Ameghiniana</source>
               <volume>48</volume>
               <year>2011</year>
               <page-range>R74–R75</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0365">
            <label>Woodward et al., 2011</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0365" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Woodward</surname>
                  <given-names>H.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Farlow</surname>
                  <given-names>J.O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Osteohistological evidence for determinate growth in the American Alligator</article-title>
               <source>J. Herpetol.</source>
               <volume>45</volume>
               <year>2011</year>
               <page-range>339–342</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0370">
            <label>Woodward et al., 2014</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0370" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Woodward</surname>
                  <given-names>H.N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Horner</surname>
                  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Farlow</surname>
                  <given-names>J.O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Quantification of intraskeletal histovariability in <italic>Alligator mississippiensis</italic> and implications for vertebrate osteohistology</article-title>
               <source>Peer J.</source>
               <volume>2</volume>
               <year>2014</year>
               <page-range>e422</page-range>
               <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.422</pub-id>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0375">
            <label>Woolbright, 1989</label>
            <element-citation id="sbref0375" publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Woolbright</surname>
                  <given-names>L.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Sexual dimorphism in <italic>Eleutherodactylus coqui</italic>: selection pressures and growth rates</article-title>
               <source>Herpetologica</source>
               <volume>45</volume>
               <year>1989</year>
               <page-range>68–74</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
   <floats-group>
      <fig id="fig0005">
         <label>Fig. 1</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0015">The phylogenetic <italic>positions</italic> of A) rhynchosaurs among early saurians, and of B) <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> among the members of Rhynchosauria. Relationships from <xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Nesbitt et al. (in revision)</xref> and <xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2013</xref>. Circle = node group, chevron = stem group.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0020">Positions phylogénétiques des rhynchosauriens (A) parmi les premiers sauriens et de <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (B) parmi les membres des Rhynchosauria. Relations phylogénétiques selon <xref rid="bib0275" ref-type="bibr">Nesbitt et al. (sous révision)</xref> et <xref rid="bib0250" ref-type="bibr">Montefeltro et al., 2013</xref>. Cercle = groupe de nœuds, chevron = groupe de la tige.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr1.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0010">
         <label>Fig. 2</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0025">(Color online.) Left femur (A, B) and right tibia (C, D) of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PV R 36618). A. Sectioned femur in dorsal view, with missing portions reconstructed based on <xref rid="bib0340" ref-type="bibr">von Huene (1938)</xref>. B. Femoral cross-section at mid-diaphysis. C. Sectioned tibia in anterior view with missing portions reconstructed based on <xref rid="bib0340" ref-type="bibr">von Huene (1938)</xref>. D. Tibial cross-section at mid-diaphysis. Brackets indicate regions sampled for histological study. Scales: A, C = 3 cm; B = 10 mm; D = 5 mm. Abbreviations: ar: adductor ridge; An: anterior; cr: anterior crest; el: endosteal lamellae; La: lateral; mc: medullary cavity; Po: posterior; Ve: ventral.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0030">(Couleur en ligne.) Fémur gauche (A, B) et tibia droit (C, D) de <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PV R 36618). A. Coupe de fémur en vue dorsale, avec les parties manquantes reconstituées d’après <xref rid="bib0340" ref-type="bibr">von Huene (1938)</xref>. B. Section transversale du fémur à mi-diaphyse. C. Coupe de tibia en vue antérieure, avec les parties manquantes reconstituées d’après <xref rid="bib0340" ref-type="bibr">von Huene (1938)</xref>. D. Section transversale du tibia à mi-diaphyse. Les crochets indiquent les zones échantillonnées pour l’étude histologique. Échelles : A, C = 3 cm ; B = 10 mm ; D = 5 mm. Abréviations : ar : crête adductrice ; An : antérieure ; cr : crête antérieure ; el : lamelles endostéales ; La : latérale ; mc : cavité médullaire ; Po : postérieure ; Ve : ventrale.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr2.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0015">
         <label>Fig. 3</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0035">(Color online.) Mid-diaphyseal microstructure of the femur of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PV R 36618) in single plane polarized light (A, B, D) and circularly polarized light (C). A. Radial transect across-section Fe1 showing the first ten growth marks (vertical lines). In this region, the innermost LAG is a triple LAG (three arrows); elsewhere they merge into a single LAG. Canal density and growth line spacing both decrease moving periosteally (to left of image). The outer two growth marks are not preserved in this region of the cortex because of surface abrasion. B. Close-up of the middle cortex of section Fe1 (between LAGs 3 and 4), showing variation in vascular canal type. C. Same region as (B) in circularly polarized light to highlight parallel-fibered bone. D. Inner cortex of section Fe2 showing primary tissues preserved between erosion rooms. Abbreviations: efs: external fundamental system; er: erosion room; lag: line of arrested growth; po: primary osteon; spc: simple primary canal. Scales: A = 1 mm; B, C, D = 250 μm.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0040">(Couleur en ligne.) Microstructure mi-diaphysaire du fémur de <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> en lumière polarisée plane (A, B, D) et en lumière polarisée circulairement (C). A. Transect radial à travers la section Fe1, montrant les dix premières marques de croissance arrêtée (lignes verticales). Dans cette région, la LAG la plus profonde est une LAG triple (trois flèches) ; ailleurs elles fusionnent en une seule ligne. La densité des canaux et l’espacement entre les lignes de croissance diminuent à l’approche du périoste (à gauche de l’image). Les deux marques de croissance externe ne sont pas conservées dans cette zone du cortex, du fait de l’abrasion de surface. B. Gros plan du cortex médian de la coupe Fe1 (entre les LAGs 3 et 4), montrant la variation dans le canal vasculaire type. C. Même zone que (B) en lumière polarisée circulairement pour mettre en évidence l’os à fibres parallèles. D. Cortex interne de la coupe Fe2 montrant les tissus primaires conservés entre les espaces érodés. Échelles : A = 1 mm ; B, C, D = 250 μm. Abréviations : efs : système externe fondamentale ; er : espace d’érosion ; lag : ligne de la croissance arrêtée ; po : ostéone primaire ; spc : canal primaire simple.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr3.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0020">
         <label>Fig. 4</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0045">(Color online.) Mid-diaphyseal microstructure of the tibia of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PV R 36618, section T2) in single plane polarized light. A. Radial transect showing the transition from cancellous to compact bone, growth marks (vertical lines), and the EFS. Canal density and growth line spacing both decrease moving periosteally (to left of image). B. Inner cortex, showing primary tissues preserved between erosion rooms. The primary osteons are arranged circumferentially and in radial rows (periosteum to upper right of image). C. Mid-cortex showing decrease in vascular canal density external to LAG 3 (periosteum to upper right of image). On the right side of this image, a zone of lamellar bone lies immediately outside of the LAG. The rest of this zone is composed of parallel-fibered bone. Scales: A = 1.25 mm; B, C = 250 μm. Abbreviations: efs: external fundamental system; er: erosion room; lag: line of arrested growth; lb: lamellar bone; pfb: parallel-fibered bone; po: primary osteon.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0050">(Couleur en ligne.) Microstructure à mi-diaphyse du tibia de <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PVR 36618 ? coupe T2) en lumière polarisée régulière. A. Transect radial à travers la coupe, montrant la transition du tissu osseux de spongieux de à compact, les marques de croissance (lignes verticales) et le système externe fondamental (EFS). La densité des canaux et l’espacement entre les marques de croissance diminuent vers le périoste (à gauche de l’image). B. Cortex interne montrant les tissus primaires conservés entre les espaces érodés. Les ostéones primaires sont disposés sur la circonférence et en rangées radiales (périoste en haut à droite de l’image). C. Cortex médian montrant la diminution de la densité en canaux vasculaires à l’extérieur de la LAG 3 (périoste en haut à droite de l’image). Sur le côté droit de cette image, une zone d’os lamellaire est immédiatement à l’extérieur de la ligne de croissance arrêtée. Le reste de cette zone est composé de tissu osseux à fibres parallèles. Échelles : A = 1,25 mm ; B, C = 250 μm. Abréviations : efs : système externe fondamental ; er : espace d’érosion ; lag : ligne de la croissance arrêtée ; lb : tissu osseux lamellaire ; pfb : tissu osseux à fibres parallèles ; po : ostéon primaire.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr4.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <table-wrap id="tbl0005">
         <label>Table 1</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0055">Linear measurements of the sampled left femur and right tibia of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PV R 36618). All measurements are in mm.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0060">Mesures linéaires du fémur gauche et du tibia droit de <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PV R 36618). Toutes les mesures sont en mm.</p>
         </caption>
         <oasis:table xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table">
            <oasis:tgroup cols="3">
               <oasis:colspec colname="col1"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col2"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col3"/>
               <oasis:thead valign="top">
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Measurement</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Left Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Right Tibia</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
               </oasis:thead>
               <oasis:tbody>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Total proximal-distal length</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">182</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">–</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Proximal width</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">80</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">75</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Distal width</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">79</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">50</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Distance from proximal end to the mid-diaphysis</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">99</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">85</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Mid-diaphyseal circumference</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">102</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">79</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Mid-diaphyseal width (major × minor axis)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">33.65 × 29.76</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">25.95 × 23.98</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Medullary cavity width (major × minor axis)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">4.9 × 4.5 (estimated)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">4.28 × 2.95</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
               </oasis:tbody>
            </oasis:tgroup>
         </oasis:table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="tbl0010">
         <label>Table 2</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0065">Radial bone deposition rates in the femur and tibia of <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PV R 36618) under several potential growth season durations: 383 days (the hypothesized length of a Middle Triassic year; <xref rid="bib0345" ref-type="bibr">Wells, 1963</xref>), 365 days (modern year), 270 days, and 180 days. For year 1, estimates are given assuming each bone had a radius of 2.5 or 5.0 mm as a neonate. In both elements, parallel-fibered bone is the main type of bone tissue deposited through year 5, and lamellar bone is deposited in years 6-12. Abbreviation: r(neo), radius of neonate element.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0070">Taux de dépôt osseux radial dans le fémur et le tibia de <italic>Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi</italic> (NHMUK PV R 36618), au cours de plusieurs durées potentielles de la saison de croissance : 383 jours (durée hypothétique d’une année au Trias moyen ; <xref rid="bib0345" ref-type="bibr">Wells, 1963</xref>), 365 jours (année moderne), 270 jours et 180 jours. Pour l’année 1, les estimations sont données en supposant que chaque os a un rayon de 2,5 ou 5,0 mm comme un nouveau-né. Dans les deux éléments, l’os à fibres parallèles est le principal type de tissu osseux déposé en 5 ans, et l’os lamellaire, celui qui se dépose en 6 à 12 ans. Abréviation : r(neo), rayon de l’os nouveau-né.</p>
         </caption>
         <oasis:table xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table">
            <oasis:tgroup cols="6">
               <oasis:colspec colname="col1"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col2"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col3"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col4"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col5"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col6"/>
               <oasis:thead valign="top">
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1"/>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Annual growth</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Growth duration = 383 d/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Growth duration = 365 d/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Growth duration = 270 d/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Growth duration = 180 d/year</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
               </oasis:thead>
               <oasis:tbody>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>Femur</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left"> Year 1, r (neo) = 2.5 mm</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">8160 μm/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">21.31 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">22.36 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">30.22 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">45.33 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left"> Year 1, r (neo) = 5 mm</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">5660 μm/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">14.78 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">15.51 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">20.96 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">31.44 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left"> Years 2–5 (mean)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">1000 μm/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">2.61 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">2.74 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">3.70 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">5.56 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left"> Years 6–12 (mean)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">160 μm/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.42 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.44 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.59 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.89 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6" align="left"/>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>Tibia</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left"> Year 1, r (neo) = 2.5 mm</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">6480 μm/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">16.92 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">17.75 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">24.00 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">36.00 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left"> Year 1, r (neo) = 5 mm</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">3980 μm/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">10.39 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">10.90 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">14.74 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">22.11 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left"> Years 2–5 (mean)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">630 μm/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">1.65 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">1.73 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">2.33 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">3.50 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left"> Years 6–12 (mean)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">150 μm/year</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.39 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.41 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.56 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.83 μm/d</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
               </oasis:tbody>
            </oasis:tgroup>
         </oasis:table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="tbl0015">
         <label>Table 3</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0075">Periosteal deposition rates for parallel-fibered bone in the humeri, femora, and tibiae of living and extinct (denoted with †) tetrapods. <italic>For Stenaulorhynchus</italic>, deposition rates are given for the first year (1) and second through fifth years (2–5) separately.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0080">Taux de dépôt périostique pour l’os à fibres parallèles dans les humérus, les fémurs et les tibias des tétrapodes vivants et éteints (notée avec †). Pour <italic>Stenaulorhynchus</italic>, les taux de dépôt sont indiqués pour la première année (1) et de la deuxième à la cinquième années (2–5) séparément.</p>
         </caption>
         <oasis:table xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table">
            <oasis:tgroup cols="5">
               <oasis:colspec colname="col1"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col2"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col3"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col4"/>
               <oasis:colspec colname="col5"/>
               <oasis:thead valign="top">
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Clade</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Taxon</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Element</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Deposition Rate (μm/d)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry rowsep="1" align="left">Study</oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
               </oasis:thead>
               <oasis:tbody>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Anura</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Nectophrynoides occidentalis</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.52–0.62</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0050" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2000a</xref> and <xref rid="bib0055" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2000b</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Caudata</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Triturus cristatus</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Humerus</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.15–0.25</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0150" ref-type="bibr">Francillon, 1979</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Archosauromorpha</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>†</bold>
                        <italic>
                           <bold>Stenaulorhynchus</bold>
                        </italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>Femur (1)</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>14.78–45.33</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>This study</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>Femur (2–5)</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>2.61–5.56</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>Tibia (1)</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>10.39–36.00</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>Tibia (2–5)</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <bold>1.65–3.50</bold>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">†<italic>Proterosuchus fergusi</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Humerus, Femur, Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">11.3</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">†<italic>Euparkeria capensis</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Humerus, Femur, Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">1.4</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Botha-Brink and Smith, 2011</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Alligator mississippiensis</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">2.99–5.94</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0305" ref-type="bibr">Roberts et al., 1988</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.53–3.67</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0370" ref-type="bibr">Woodward et al., 2014</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.21–2.76</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0370" ref-type="bibr">Woodward et al., 2014</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">†<italic>Rhamphorhynchus</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">2.5–5</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0295" ref-type="bibr">Padian et al., 2004</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">†<italic>Masiakasaurus knopfleri</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur, tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">∼ 3</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0230" ref-type="bibr">Lee and O’Connor, 2013</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Anas platyrhynchos</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">(several)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.2–30</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">de Margerie et al., 2002</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Chelonia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Pelodiscus sinensis</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.39</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0255" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2007</xref> and <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2010</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Emys orbicularis</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.25–0.37</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0030" ref-type="bibr">Castanet, 1985</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Lepidosauria</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Sphenodon punctatus</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.28–0.36</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0040" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 1988</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Gallotia atlantica</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.30–0.45</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0035" ref-type="bibr">Castanet and Baez, 1991</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>G. galloti galloti</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.20–0.50</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0035" ref-type="bibr">Castanet and Baez, 1991</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">†<italic>G. goliath</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.18–0.74</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0035" ref-type="bibr">Castanet and Baez, 1991</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>G. stehlini</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.20–0.53</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0035" ref-type="bibr">Castanet and Baez, 1991</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Lacerta viridis</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Femur</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.14–0.56</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0030" ref-type="bibr">Castanet, 1985</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Podarcis muralis</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.15</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0255" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2007</xref> and <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2010</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Varanus exanthematicus</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">1.02</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0255" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2007</xref> and <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2010</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>V. niloticus</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.8</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0255" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2007</xref> and <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2010</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Zootoca vivipara</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.22</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0255" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2007</xref> and <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2010</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Mammalia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Macaca nemestrina</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Humerus</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">0.9–10.9 (usually ∼ 2)</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0280" ref-type="bibr">Newell-Morris and Sirianni, 1982</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Microcebus murinus</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">3–8</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0380" ref-type="bibr">Castanet et al., 2004</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
                  <oasis:row>
                     <oasis:entry/>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <italic>Mus musculus</italic>
                     </oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">Tibia</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">4.08</oasis:entry>
                     <oasis:entry align="left">
                        <xref rid="bib0255" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2007</xref> and <xref rid="bib0260" ref-type="bibr">Montes et al., 2010</xref>
                     </oasis:entry>
                  </oasis:row>
               </oasis:tbody>
            </oasis:tgroup>
         </oasis:table>
      </table-wrap>
   </floats-group>
</article>